Negotiating Open Access Journal Agreements: An Academic Library Case Study

Mihoko Hosoi


The COVID-19 pandemic has presented an opportunity for academic libraries to advance open access (OA) to scholarly articles. Awareness among faculty on the importance of OA has increased significantly during the pandemic, as colleges and universities struggle financially and seek sustainable access to high-quality scholarly journals. Consortia have played an important role in establishing negotiation principles on OA journal agreements. While the number of OA agreements is increasing, case studies involving individual libraries are still limited. This paper reviews existing literature on publisher negotiation principles related to OA journal negotiations and reflects on recent cases at an academic library in Pennsylvania, in order to identify best practices in OA journal negotiations. It provides recommendations on roles, relationships, and processes, as well as essential terms of OA journal agreements. This study’s findings are most relevant to large academic libraries that are interested in negotiating with scholarly journal publishers independently or through consortia.

Full Text:



Asai, S. (2021). An analysis of revising article processing charges for open access journals between 2018 and 2020. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 137–143.

Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. (2020). How covid-19 changed everything and nothing at all.

Big Ten Academic Alliance. (n.d.). Open scholarship. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from

Björk, B.-C. (2021). Why Is access to the scholarly journal literature so expensive? Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 21(2), 177–192.

Borrego, Á., Anglada, L., & Abadal, E. (2021). Transformative agreements: Do they pave the way to open access? Learned Publishing, 34(2), 216–232.

California Digital Library. (2019). Licensing toolkit.

Canadian Research Knowledge Network. (2016). Model license.

Dawson, D. (DeDe). (2018). Effective practices and strategies for open access outreach: A qualitative study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 6(General Issue), 0–36.

Eddy, M. A., & Solomon, D. (2017). Leveraging librarian liaison expertise in a new consultancy role. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(2), 121–127.

ESAC Initiative. (n.d.-a). ESAC transformative agreement registry. Retrieved February 5, 2021, from

ESAC Initiative. (n.d.-b). Negotiation principles internationally. Retrieved February 5, 2021, from

Gillies, S. (2014). Negotiating author fees for hybrid OA journals: Library consortial leadership. Collection Management, 39(4), 231–252.

Hinchliffe, L. J. (2019). Transformative agreements: A primer. Scholarly Kitchen.

Iowa State University Library. (2019). Principles for advancing openness through journal negotiations.

Ithaka S+R. (2020). Project launch: Canceling the big deal.

Jisc. (n.d.-a). Jisc model licences. Retrieved February 6, 2021, from

Jisc. (n.d.-b). Our role in open access. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from

Lange, J., & Hanson, C. (2020). “You need to make it as easy as possible for me”: Creating scholarly communication reports for liaison librarians. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 8(1), 0–22.

LIBER. (2017). Open access: Five principles for negotiations with publishers.

Machovec, G. (2020). Selected tools and services for analyzing and managing open access journal transformative agreements. Journal of Library Administration, 60(3), 301–307.

MIT Libraries. (2020). MIT framework for publisher contracts.

National Association of College and University Business Officers. (2021). Business officers share steps taken to weather pandemic pressures.

O’Gara, G., & Osterman, A. C. (2019). Negotiating on our terms: Harnessing the collective power of the consortium to transform the journal subscription model. Collection Management, 44(2–4), 176–194.

Office of Scholarly Communication. University of California. (n.d.-a). An introductory guide to the UC model transformative agreement. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from

Office of Scholarly Communication. University of California. (n.d.-b). Guidelines for evaluating transformative open access agreements. Retrieved February 6, 2021, from

Office of Scholarly Communication. University of California. (2018). Pathways to open access.

Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137–145.

Projekt DEAL. (n.d.). About DEAL.

Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.

The Pennsylvania State University. (2020). Penn State Libraries reducing collections budget for 2020-21 fiscal year. Penn State News.

The Pennsylvania State University. (2021). Access to Penn State scholarly research expands through two new agreements. Penn State News.

UC Publisher Strategy and Negotiation Task Force. (2019a). Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers.

UC Publisher Strategy and Negotiation Task Force. (2019b). Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers A toolkit from the University of California. May, 1–15.

Wellcome. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19): Sharing research data.


Copyright (c) 2021 Mihoko Hosoi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.