Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Leveraging Citation Management Software (CMS) for Broad Library Impact
Abstract
Librarians recognized an opportunity to grow the number of RefWorks users on campus and launched an initiative to more aggressively market the software. Barriers to growth were recognized, staff training was undertaken, and targeted services and programming were infused with more content centered on the citation management software (CMS). After a year and a half, the library assessed the popularity and impact of the program. While RefWorks is now much more widely used on campus, it has also led to additional instructional classes, workshops, and reference transactions. These additional and unanticipated benefits have greatly enhanced the reputation of the software among librarians. In addition, students, faculty, and university administrators have all responded positively to the results of the initiative, enhancing the reputation of the library on campus. Other academic libraries may benefit from a similar campaign based on their own subscription CMS.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Basak, S. (2014). A comparison of researcher’s reference management software: Refworks,
Mendeley, and EndNote. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 6(7), 561-568.
Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2202
Black, E. L. (2014). Engaging beyond the first college year: Exploring the needs of second-year
students. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(2), 170-179. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.2.170
Bowles-Terry, M. (2012). Library instruction and academic success: A mixed-method
assessment of a library instruction program. Evidence Based Library and Information
Practice, 7(1), 82-95. doi:10.18438/B8PS4D
Buehler, M. A., & Zald, A. E. (2013). At the nexus of scholarly communication and information
literacy: Promoting graduate student publishing success. In S. Davis-Kahl & M. K. Hensley (Eds.), Common ground at the nexus of information literacy and scholarly communication (pp. 215-235). Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries.
Bussell, H., Hagman, J., & Guder, C. S. (2017). Research needs and learning format preferences
of graduate students at a large public university: An exploratory study. College & Research Libraries, 78(7), 978-998. doi:10.5860/crl.78.7.978
Butros, A., & Taylor, S. (2011). Managing information: Evaluating and selecting citation
management software, a look at EndNote, RefWorks, Mendeley and Zotero. In D. Barr
(Ed.), Netting knowledge: Two hemispheres/one world: Proceedings of the 36th
IAMSLIC Annual Conference (pp. 1-47). Retrieved from https://darchive.mblwhoilibrary. org/bitstream/handle/1912/4595/Butros-Taylor_iamslic2010.pdf;sequence=1
Childress, D. (2011). Citation tools in academic libraries: Best practices for reference and
instruction. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51(2), 143-152. Retrieved from
https://www.jstor.org/stable/refuseserq.51.2.143
Covert-Vail, L., & Collard, S. (2012). New roles for new times: Research library services for
graduate students. Retrieved from Association of Research Libraries website: http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/nrnt-grad-roles-20dec12.pdf
Cranston, C. L., & Level, A. V. (2006). Forward progress one step at a time. Public Services
Quarterly, 2(2-3), 19-32. doi:10.1300/J295v02n02_03
D’Couto, M., & Rosenhan, S. H. (2015). How students research: Implications for the library and
faculty. Journal of Library Administration, 55, 562-576. doi:10.1080/01930826.2015.1076312
Duong, K. (2010). Rolling out Zotero across campus as a part of a science librarian's outreach
efforts. Science & Technology Libraries, 29(4), 315-324. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2010.523309
East, J. (2001). Academic libraries and the provision of support for users of personal
bibliographic software: A survey of Australian experience with EndNote. LASIE: Library
Automated Systems Information Exchange, 32(1), 64-70. Retrieved from
https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=750746137901774;res=IELAPA
Emanuel, J. (2013). Users and citation management tools: Use and support. Reference Services
Review, 41(4), 639-659. doi:10.1108/RSR-02-2013-0007
Fong, B. L., Wang, M., White, K., & Tipton, R. (2016). Assessing and serving the workshop
needs of graduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 569-580.
doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.003
Garfield, J. M., Flanagan, H., & Fox, J. (1989). A comparison of two microcomputer-based
programs for bibliographic retrieval and formatting. Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 5(3),
-185. doi:10.1007/BF01627450
Gessner, G. C., Jaggars, D. E., Rutner, J., & Tancheva, K. (2011). Supporting humanities
doctoral student success: A collaborative project between Cornell University Library and Columbia University Libraries. Columbia University Academic Commons, doi:10.7916/D8K93GJH
Gilmour, R., & Cobus-Kuo, L. (2011). Reference management software: A comparative analysis
of four products. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 66(66), 63-75. doi:10.5062/F4Z60KZF
Harrison, M., Summerton, S., & Peters, K. (2005). Endnote training for academic staff and
students: The experience of the Manchester Metropolitan University Library. New
Review of Academic Librarianship, 11(1), 31-40. doi:10.1080/13614530500417594
Hensley, M. K. (2011). Citation management software: Features and futures. Reference & User
Services Quarterly, 50(3), 204-208. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41241164
Hristova, M. (2012). RefWorks usage patterns: Exploring the first four semesters of use by
faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates. Internet Reference Services Quarterly,
(2), 45-64. doi:10.1080/10875301.2012.720654
Kiernan, V. (2006). Toss out the index cards. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(40), A29.
Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Toss-Out-the-Index-Cards-1/28425/
King, R., Hooper, B., & Wood, W. (2011). Using bibliographic software to appraise and code
data in educational systematic review research. Medical Teacher, 33(9), 719-723.
doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.558138
Kuglitsch, R., & Burge, P. (2016). Beyond the first year: Supporting sophomores through
information literacy outreach. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 23(1), 79-92. doi:10.1080/10691316.2014.944636
Lonergan, N. (2017). Reference management software preferences among liberal arts faculty.
Reference Services Review, 45(4): 584-595. doi:10.1108/RSR-06-2017-0024
Lorenzetti, D. L., & Ghali, W. A. (2013). Reference management software for systematic
reviews and meta-analyses: An exploration of usage and usability. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(141). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-141
Marino, W. (2012). Fore-cite: Tactics for evaluating citation management tools. Reference
Services Review, 40(2), 295-310. doi:10.1108/00907321211228336
McMinn, H. S. (2011). Library support of bibliographic management tools: A review. Reference
Services Review, 39(2), 278-302. doi:10.1108/00907321111135493
Melles, A., & Unsworth, K. (2015). Examining the reference management practices of
humanities and social science postgraduate students and academics. Australian Academic
& Research Libraries, 46(4), 249-274. doi:10.1080/00048623.2015.1104790
Niu, X., Hemminger, B. M., Lown, C., Adams, S., Brown, C., Level, A., McLure, M., Powers,
A., Tennant, M., & Cataldo, T. (2010). National study of information seeking behavior of
academic researchers in the United States. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 61, 869-890. doi:10.1002/asi.21307
Owen, D. (1997). Using personal reprint management software to teach information management
skills for the electronic library. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 16(4), 29-41.
doi:10.1300/J115V16N04_03
Salem, J. & Fehrmann, P. (2013). Bibliographic management software: A focus group study of
the preferences and practices of undergraduate students. Public Services
Quarterly, 9(2), 110-120. doi:10.1080/15228959.2013.785878
Saunders, E. S. (2003). The effect of bibliographic instruction on the demand for reference
services. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1), 35-39. doi:10.1353/pla.2003.0019
Siegler, S., & Simboli, B. (2002). EndNote at Lehigh. Issues in Science and Technology
Librarianship, 34, 149. doi:10.5062/F43N21CP
Steele, S. E. (2008). Bibliographic citation management software as a tool for building
knowledge. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 35(5), 463-468. doi:
1097/01.WON.0000335956.45311.69
Steeleworthy, M., & Dewan, P. T. (2013). Web-based citation management systems: Which one
is best? Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and
Research, 8(1). Retrieved from https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/view/2220
Tramullas, J., Sánchez-Casabón, A., & Garrido-Picazo, P. (2015). Studies and analysis of
reference management software: A literature review. El profesional de la información,
, (5), 680-688. doi:10.3145/epi.2015.sep.17
Turner, L. (2017). Word of mouth and library workshops: Let’s get people talking. College &
Research Libraries News, 78(3), 142-143. doi:10.5860/crln.78.3.9636
Vezzosi, M. (2009). Doctoral students’ information behaviour: An exploratory study at the
University of Parma (Italy). New Library World, 110, 65-80. doi:10.1108/03074800910928595
Wong, S. H. R., & Cmor, D. (2011). Measuring association between library instruction and
graduation GPA. College & Research Libraries, 72(5), 464-473. doi:10.5860/crl-151
Wu, M., & Chen, S. (2012). How graduate students perceive, use, and manage electronic
resources. Aslib Proceedings, 64, 641-652. doi:10.1108/00012531211281779
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/palrap.2018.189
Copyright (c) 2018 Ron McColl
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal is published by the University Library System, University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.